| |
DECISION ID |
14368 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Weight of Evidence: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Neither of the 2 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (Sipmann and Finlayson, 2000) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. However, there are an insufficient number of samples to make a "use rating" decision. Central Coast Water Board staff require a minimum of 16 samples to make a "use rating" decision of Fully Supporting.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Neither of the 2 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (Sipmann and Finlayson, 2000) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
|
| |
| USEPA Decision: |
|
| |
| |
| |
| LOE ID: |
18674 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River Estuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for chlorpyrifos. |
| Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
|
| |
Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
|
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
Water Quality Control Plan Central Coast Region (R3) Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River Estuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ DHS015 - Pajaro River Lagoon located in the Watsonville Slough] |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
| QAPP Information: |
No QAPP was provided for this data set. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
18675 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River Estuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for chlorpyrifos. |
| Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
|
| |
Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
|
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
Water Quality Control Plan Central Coast Region (R3) Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River Estuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ DHS015 - Pajaro River Lagoon located in the Watsonville Slough] |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
| QAPP Information: |
No QAPP was provided for this data set. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
| |
DECISION ID |
14369 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Weight of Evidence: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Neither of the 2 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (Sipmann and Finlayson, 2000) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. However, there are an insufficient number of samples to make a "use rating" decision. Central Coast Water Board staff require a minimum of 16 samples to make a "use rating" decision of Fully Supporting.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Neither of the 2 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (Sipmann and Finlayson, 2000) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
|
| |
| USEPA Decision: |
|
| |
| |
Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 14369 |
| |
| LOE ID: |
18754 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River Estuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
|
| |
Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
|
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
Water Quality Control Plan Central Coast Region (R3) Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River Estuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ DHS015 - Pajaro River Lagoon located in the Watsonville Slough] |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
| QAPP Information: |
No QAPP was provided for this data set. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
18755 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River Estuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
|
| |
Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
|
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
Water Quality Control Plan Central Coast Region (R3) Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River Estuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ DHS015 - Pajaro River Lagoon located in the Watsonville Slough] |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
| QAPP Information: |
No QAPP was provided for this data set. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |